WARNING: SPOILERS GALORE!

For some reason, the capture software I used to get screengrabs decided to render a busy cursor that wasn't there when I played...
If you have seen my Twitter page, which is very unlikely, you will have already seen my one word review of Doctor Who – The Adventure Games Episode 1: City of the Daleks, a strong contender for Least Wieldy Game Title Ever, up against such fare as Strong Bad’s Cool Game For Attractive People Episode 4 – Dangeresque 3: The Criminal Projective. If not, I’ll paraphrase it for you: “AAAAAARRRRRRRGGGGHHHHHH!!!”
And now, a slightly more erudite review.
Before I start, I should point out that many problems I have with CotD are not anyone’s fault but my own. See, I make a point to only play games several years old, so my creaky 2005 laptop doesn’t have an aneurism over trying to play a game designed for 2010 PCs. However, as we are talking about a game described as an additional episode to Series 5/1/31/Fnarg/Whatever, I decided to ignore the BBC website’s warning that my processor was not man enough to take on the dizzying heights of a freebie adventure game. Therefore, playing with a frame rate that would make a flipbook drawing sneer did nothing but exacerbate problems.

...as well as not rendering some things I distinctly remember being there.
Also, after completing it in a single infuriating afternoon, it was after I mentally wrote this review that the BBC then seemed to psychically detect what I was about to write, and immediately turned around and said “Oh yeah, it’s a beta”. You know what? Screw you. I was not told that when playing or evaluating, so this, BBC, is what happens when you release a beta without saying it’s a beta. I don’t want to see any comments claiming my issues with CotD have been fixed in the final version, if you trick me into thinking a beta is the final release, I’ll treat the beta as if it were final, as that was what it was called when I downloaded it.
With that said, the review.
Continue reading →